Erodov.com Forums | India's Top Technology forum.
Loading

navigation start navigation end
Go Back   Erodov.com Forums | India's Top Technology forum. > Hardware Zone > Cooling and Overclocking
Register Forgot Password?

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-09-08   #1
Tiger Style
Pr[e]f[e]rr[e]d M[e]mb[e]r
Dont buy HIS products
 
 
Mav3ricK's Avatar

CPU bottleneck explained


At Legion Hardware, a 4870X2 was paired with few CPUs (overclocked as well as underclocked).

This is what the result looked like

Click this bar to view the small image.


So much for giving preference to Dual cores over quads for gaming.


Ok, CoH was extreme situation. The normal results were something like this

Click this bar to view the small image.

Conclusion was:

There were certainly a number of interesting results recorded when testing such a large range of processors with the Radeon HD 4870 X2. Perhaps the most interesting thing that we have noticed is how much faster the Core 2 Quad processors were when compared to the Core 2 Duo’s, this is not something that we have really seen before. This was really evident in Company of Heroes, where the Intel quad-core processors were roughly 100% faster than their dual-core parts.

While Company of Heroes was the most extreme example, all other games tested still gave the quad-core processors an advantage. Generally the performance margin between the Core 2 Duo and Phenom X4 processors was quite minimal, though more often than not the Intel dual-core processors did outperform the AMD quad-core parts. This is neither new nor surprising, as we have seen this time and time again in the past.

Although it was not all that surprising to see just how much the Athlon64 X2 architecture has aged since we last looked at it, we were still somewhat shocked at how slow the 3.46GHz 6400+ processor was. Obviously we do not expect that AMD Athlon64 X2 owners are going to race out and purchase a Radeon HD 4870 X2, but we still felt that including this processor series would be useful. Those still using an Athlon64 X2 should seriously consider upgrading their platform, even if they only plan to purchase a single current generation AMD or Nvidia graphics card.

Out of the five games used for testing, Devil May Cry was the only one that allowed the processors to find the limits of the Radeon HD 4870 X2. It would seem that this game is more GPU dependent than the others, as the Phenom X4 9850/9950 and Core 2 Quad Q6600/9650 processors were able to max out the graphics card. While the Core 2 Duo processors also did very well in this game, the overclocked 3.46GHz Athlon64 X2 6400+ processor was slower than the E6320.

Another game that strongly favored the quad-core processors was Enemy Territory Quake Wars. Here the Core 2 Quad Q9650 managed 133fps, while the Q6600 averaged 119fps. The Phenom X4 processors were next in line, with the 9950 averaging 115fps, and the 9850 reached 113fps. In fact the Phenom X4 9750 and 9650 processors were also able to outperform the E6850, which only narrowly edged out the 9550.

The Supreme Commander results were more like what we were expecting. Here the Core 2 Quad processors were only slightly faster than the dual-core versions, while the Phenom X4 processors were able to match the Core 2 Duo’s for the most part. However, Supreme Commander was another game that continually saw the Radeon HD 4870 X2 become faster, as the processors became more powerful and we never really saw the limits.

Finally, Unreal Tournament 3 painted an interesting picture, as there was a significant difference in performance between the fastest and the slowest processors tested. Once again the Core 2 Quad Q9650 was the king here, delivering 132fps at its default clock frequency of 3.0GHz, which was impressive when compared to the E6850 for example, which managed just 118fps at the same frequency. The best Phenom X4 processor was of course the 9950, which averaged 113fps, edging out the old E6700 by 2fps.

Again the Radeon HD 4870 X2 limits were not seen, as the results continued to improve with the processors clock speed. While we always suspected that the world’s fastest graphics card would require the world’s fastest processor, we know now for certain that it does. Those with lower-end Core 2 Duo/Quad processors can squeeze a great deal of performance out of the Radeon HD 4870 X2 simply by overclocking their processor past 3.0GHz, which is well within the limits of these processors.

Due to a lack of raw clock speed, the Phenom X4 processors did fall short in most tests, and even at 3.0GHz the 9950 struggled with the competition. Given that all tests were conducted at 1920x1200 with 8xAA/16xAF enabled, the results were impressive, and while the Phenom X4 processors did deliver acceptable performance, processors such as the Core 2 Quad Q9650 proved that the Radeon HD 4870 X2 still has much more potential just waiting to be unleashed.






Link: Legion Hardware



Copied from techenclave
__________________
System Specs:

VGA:HIS R9280X 3gb
Monitor:BENQ 22"
MB:Socket 1155 - GA-H77-DS3H
OS:Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
CPU:i7 3770
Sound:M-Audio Audiophile 2496
Speakers: Edifier C2 2.1
Memory: 8 Gb Corsair
PSU: Cooler Master G600 80 Plus
HDD: 160 + 250 + 320 gb Seagate
Cooling: Antec C40
Chassis: CM 690

Mav3ricK is offline   Reply With Quote
Post New Thread  Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes



Tags
bottleneck, cpu, explained
All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 07:52 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.