Originally Posted by TheOtherGuy don't be an absolute hater, .
I dunno what you are talking about tbh,lol.
The main reason why broadband revolution hasn't really begun in India is cus of its vast size.Now dont come and say US is bigger, not all the parts of US has good internet connectivity.So in short smaller European countries and japan have it easier, and not to forget a large proportion of population subscribes so that helps in mitigating the costs.
We have all the tech, its not like building rockets tbh, fiber optics work on simple principles.Though I agree about the data traffic thingy, hardly that can be done anything about in the short run, that'll take years.
I, for one, is quite happy with the broadband scenario in India, pretty much.Its good to know I have the same internet connection, sitting in major cities as some bloke sitting in a remote village.And I like the slow but steady progress, prices are coming down slowly. |
Sorry I'm not a hater or a pessimist, I'm a just a little practical.
First of all providing fibers are not cheap they're principle's are quite easy but that doesn't have anything to do how much it costs, I remember reading in TOI that a guy registered for a BSNL connection and was refused because BSNL would have to invest 50+ Lakhs to get a connection upto his house which was 10 Kms from the local office. Imagine the investments on a large scale.
Advantages of USA and Japan is that a large portion of data they access is available locally to them. In such a scenario it is very easy for the Govt to upgrade its telephone lines and sell of the excess bandwidth to private players. So its a double whammy for them, they get to provide more users with better telecom services and in turn they get some money off the private hands. Here in India even if Government decides to upgrade its local telecom infrastructure they're won't be significant effect to the Broadband scene. Only way this can be done is if they buy more and more cables which will connect them to major International data centers. Plus accessing data is not free completely, part of our ISP bills goes into paying for that. So internet connectivity is not really a priority for our government and therefore we need not get our hopes high when Japan shifts to 1Gbps or something similar.
If you're happy with current net progress in our country then I dunno why I typed all of this shiz, So I guess you're previous statement about wanting 10Mbps @ 1k was just a mention from your wishlist? If that be the case then I wantz 1Gbps netz @ 100 bux and a free copy of playboy with that.
Originally Posted by manu1991 Wow , just throwing random statements like "Countries like US, UK and India are just a big consumer lot" . Do you even know that the Internet itself originated in the US . I guess not. Please dont spread FUD. |
In respect of your "non-random statement" I would also like to make a statement that comes on par with yours. Our great mathematician Aryabhatta invented 0. As we are living in the computer age and we know it process' binary language which consists of 0 and 1. Therefore we can conclude that India is responsible for half the technological advancement of the world.
Regarding Internet originating in the US, yes they did invent ARPANET to cater to its Department of Defense's needs. This was later transformed into NSFNET which interconnected all the Universities of US. Major commercial companies like IBM joined in to create the ANSNET. This was bought by America Online and taken away from the Govt of US. Many other commercial organization came in and started selling IP address to let their user's host whatever they want. And we can say that Internet was born then. After that US has not had a major role in developing it further unless of course there is a commercial cause behind this like the recent case of Google wanting to provide half a million homes with 100 Mbit connection to make their ChromeOS feasible and formerly Bill Gates promising users large BW with the help of Teledesic to help Microsoft's cause.